“barbaric policy” new failure: Deriving their withdrawal was of seven members of the Board of the Royal Institute of Amazigh Culture management, on February 21, 2005, the Beginning of the End of the “barbaric policy,” the new, qui About did not last for only a Few years, and Provides clear proof of the approach culturalism and Alokadimoah Amazigh issue failure, qui que la Confirms Altguenoa and Alalamue deal with the subject is political in origin and nature, before it is Culturally and linguistically, a waste of time is not. This approach is designed to contenir the Tamazight and revoke effect across the political advancement as a mere subject of Object realization of Their right of research and study and attention. Here error of this approach / trick, Because The real rehabilitation, not deceptive, the HCA is not Promoted as a theme DESPITE the importance of this aspect, as an entity goal with this topic and effective form the basis for the existence of and political Identity Morocco as a Amazigh (Berber). Without dealing with the Amazigh as an entity and with the depth and Hoiati political incarnation Amazigh country, to deal with it as a subject Without Any impact on the level of rehabilitation and reconciliation with her remains. Indeed, this second type of deal May legitimize the exclusion and marginalization, and the denial of Their right to Identity and political presence Posed as an entity and KMAT, not as a subject for scientific study and academic research. Even what has-been Achieved at the level of mind remains the subject of an end in Itself and for itself, and not as a means clustering for something else associated side Identity and political Amazigh as an entity and KMAT. THUS, the teaching of Tamazight as an example of a tax que le serious and successful teaching, always begs the question: Why do we study this language to our children? What is icts function as a language? Without limitation of this functionality, end the teaching of Amazigh are remaining Taught to teach, and not as a means clustering Taught to something else, a recognition of status Identity ict and political group as an entity and are effective, this language with the language of Becomes power and policy and management, ie, the language of the state. THUS, it is the recognition of Tamazight, Collectively as an entity and KMAT actor, Who will give Meaning and relevance to rehabilitate em at the level of dealing with it as a theme. Summed up the “new barbarism politics”, Then, in the interest Tamazight as a subject of research and study, with work on the lack of ict happy and killed Identity and political group as an entity KMAT present and active. This is the task Undertaken by the Institute as a scientific and academic research about Amazigh taken Any subject is an actor and a negative thing. This contradiction entre les Amazigh have something / subject, and entre les Amazigh as an entity / with, is what led to a rapid failure “barbaric policy” new lancé by the Institute internship, and que la withdrawal of the seven members of this institution have a statement about the Beginning of the End for this “barbaric policy,” the new, as already Signal. This failure shows it Reviews the other hand, it can not be, aim it is impossible to Reconcile with her rehabilitation and Amazigh Without Any changes in the political basis and not ethnic identity “pan-Arab” in Morocco. The conduite of the lathing, through His policies, institutions and style of diplomacy, education and letters … and the statements of rulers, as an Arab, contrasted and incompatible along the line with the Amazigh as the existence of a political group and have an entity and effective KMAT. They are opposites do not mix. Then Valtsaleh with Amazigh must pass through the revision of the political foundation of the identity of the Moroccan state, Because The exclusion of the Amazigh is Originally depth and political exclusion, and Culturally and linguistically excluded, profit as a result of this original political exclusion. The other guide, the new, the failure of These “new barbarism policy” that Began with the establishment of “a Arkam” is que la authority Itself, Claiming the policy, Have Become aware of this failure and _him_ Convinced, After he Noticed que le period of ten years of “barbaric policy,” the new About did not lead, In Spite of all the temptations and Ctwaouat exercised by “the Arkam” the Institute of the Amazigh movement, to-any downturn in the demands of this movement, nor to-any chill in the struggle qui Has not Increased, aim the strength and expansion, and to what extent the growing political orientation to this thesis demands and struggle, qui Greatly disturbs the authority That Was betting on the political neutralization of Amazigh demands it Exclusively, through the “barbaric policy,” the new, in what is Thagavoy, and Alamue, and Okadimoa, and Tguenoa … THUS authority is satisfied, Then, that ‘”barbaric policy” has failed Because The new objective, of putting an end to the demands of the Amazigh and containment, Especially in the management and content of the politicians, not Achieved anything of Them. This is why power, After ten years of experimentation “barbaric policy,” the new, implicit to the cancellation of the Institute “to Arkam” the abolition of the administrative board. It is what Makes the institute is Located in the rule of law. So que la Governing Council is the one Who marriages the institute (Chapter IV of the Dahir Ajdir), and draws the plan and propose programs and projects That puts brought` to the king for approval and ratification (Chapter VII of the back). This Council is missing permission qui Makes Institute Canceled missing and implicit, in the lack of a Legally. 2011 Constitution: Is inaugurates a new stage of “barbaric policy,” new? This implicit cancellation of the institution “to Arkam” may be a new relationship with the prestige singled out Light That Amazigh July 2011 Constitution. If so, to now there is not no indication That this is not so, what cam in the Amended Constitution of the demarcation of the conditional Amazigh language, is the announcement of a new phase “barbaric policy of” new, different from the previous Alarkamah internship Including The Following: “barbaric policy” new, lancé back by Ajdir (October 17, 2001) Was an initiative of the king, Who Issued this back under the absolute authority de son Chapter 19 of the previous Constitution. DESPITE the authoritarian kind of this chapter, aim It was Useful for HCA That are in need, Because Of icts special status as a victim Omazagovobah political culture, deep-rooted and Widespread Among the national parts That Make up the various gouvernements, to the will Possess alone the power of binding legislation, That so her passing decisions arent Discussed Amazigh favor. Which he About did in Chapter 19 with respect to the establishment of the Royal Institute of Amazigh Culture Foundation. Purpose Chapter V of the Constitution of 2011 includes The Following “organic law olefins activation of the courses of the official character of the Amazigh, and incorporated clauses in the field of education, and in the priority areas of public life, in order to be ble to do ict job in the future, as the official language. ” An significant advancement in Tamazight, Even in the framework of the “barbaric policy,” the new, no skirt permission from the jurisdiction of the King and the monopoly it. It has Become, under this Chapter V of the jurisdiction of Parliament. And if we know que la Islamic orientation (Albegide) and pan-Arab Alomazagovoba still His domination of the Moroccan parliament, we will Realize what kind of “barbaric policy,” the new Amazigh Regulatory Stsmha own laws. Why Royal Institution abandoned the “care” Amazigh Kashan special sovereign king, To Become this “care” a private affair of parliament is share of the Regulatory powers? This May be due to what we Said about the failure of the new “barbaric policy,” which Was the ownership of the initiative in the establishment of Represented Such a policy tool that (the tool) is “to Arkam” qui Was founded by King pursuant to Chapter 19 of the previous Constitution. After this failure Became a reality, as Explained Previously, the Royal Institution in continuation of the “sponsorship” “barbaric policy” failed not want. To this she wanted to get rid of this policy, After That Proved unsuccessful, Began firing into the conflict and the problem of the party accounts parliament. The Thing That will make em the outcome of political conflict and use achievement thesis parts have political benefits you earn from em, WHETHER it’s to defend em and endeavor to Promote it, and object to gold Bmnawotha ict development and rehabilitation projects. Which is turning it into a “ride to serve political purposes”, in TNAV stark and clear with what cam at the Royal Bagir discourse in the October 17, 2001, in the King Stressed qui ‘it can not take a ride Amazigh to serve political Purposes whatever the nature. ” This means clustering Confirms abandonment Amazigh Kashan royal sovereign, and give up, as a result, for “to Arkam” the same institution That HAS Become The rule of law in cancellations, as Previously Explained. When moving from Morocco “barbaricpolicy” to “Amazigh policy”? “barbaricpolicy” has Become a new obstacle to the recovery of the first Amazigh political right as the identity of the state and not to Individuals and groups, as in the “barbaric policy” derived new and old (IDS) the identity of the land of North Africa. So That this “barbaric policy,” the new, as far as the print only give the feeling That it is working to revive and Promote the Amazigh, the more They Kill and Tmitha Because It deepens political exclusion from Doubled That lead directly to Those ” barbaric policy. ” To Overcome this “barbaric policy,” the new, it shoulds struggle to go to the “Amazigh policy”, qui est with direct contrast to “the policy of barbarism.” Why is the “Amazigh policy” antithesis “of the barbaric policy” with ferries sccm They Synonymous? Is there a différence entre em? What is this difference exists That It? “barbaricpolicy” is different from “Amazigh policy,” selon the Desired Exporters verbal “barbaric” and “HCA” in two sentences. It is Well Known que la word “Berber” is a label lancé by the Amazigh Amazigh. It is a label used by foreign aliens from North Africa (Tamazgha) qui is the historical and geographical land Berber people. And “barbaric policy” derivatives icts Meaning and content of foreign significance of the word “barbaric”. So are these “barbaric policy” is set by the policy of the Amazigh Amazigh are all foreigners. It is a policy under non-Amazigh qui shoulds be decided what the Amazigh. It is the policy of “foreign permission” and determine the fate of the Amazigh orientation. The “barbaric policy,” the old and the French could, Who are Amazigh, to determine what it shoulds be the Amazigh. As well as “barbaric policy,” the new set is Amazigh transgender (original sex Meaning in Arabic, means clustering qui people and membership of a Particular human group), Who Consider Themselves Arabs Ruled Morocco, to determine by what shoulds be the fate of the Amazigh be decided and laid down thesis “Arabs” for foreign Amazigh, As They Think. So the basic element in the “barbaric policy” is of foreign origin of the foreign source of the word “barbaric”. As the word “Amazigh” is the label That Themselves lancé the Amazigh, the “Amazigh policy” that policy is Decided by the Amazigh to Themselves Themselves, Taking the kidneys of Their Own Destiny In Their hand. P “Amazigh policy” does not mean more than the restoration of the Amazigh Berber Amazigh Their sovereignty over land. And this sovereignty can not only take the form of HCA state concept Turabi and not with the ethnic Berber Amazigh identity and authority in line with the habitat in North Africa. If the goal of “barbaric policy”, old and new, is the integration of Amazigh in the new pan-Arab state, the State of transgender people, with foreign Arab identity of the identity of North Africa, the “politics of the Amazigh, “Directly Opposed to it, will est to integrate, but not Amazigh, all sexual purpose converts, Who believe That They Are the Amazigh, in Amazigh State have to keep pace with the belief That They Are foreigners for Amazigh with foreign assets, Gives’ em the stability of the land of ancestors Amazigh Their right to belong to the Amazigh land, To Become Omazegea Amazigh identity like misfits, any Who Were not exposed to disability and sexual transformation. If the “barbaric policy” deal Amazigh minority are Trying to Accommodate em by ethnic and sexual localization (national), and political and Ideological Identity, the “Amazigh policy” will be corrected this position and the deal is Amazigh misfits converts sexual minority is working to restore Tmazighm, based on what They Have the right common land Belonging to the Amazigh, Whose grandparents immigrated to centuries ago, as They Say and believe selon the logic of Becoming sexual. If the “barbaric policy” deals with the Tamazight as a negative “theme” Taught by “foreigners”, and determined the significance and content selon Their whims and interests, the “Amazigh policy” will restore the HCA role KMAT and not as a subject, as in “barbaric policy,” efficient, effective, recounts They Produces decisions without being white subject to the decisions of just –other foreigners. Putting an end to “the policy of barbarism,” the first requirement for the restoration of sovereignty Amazigh related to “barbaric policy”, qui determined the Amazigh, as share of Their state Amazigh Their Own Destiny as do all the free and independent peoples . ]]>
When will Morocco move from Barbarian politics to Amazigh (Berber) politics policy ?When will Morocco move from Barbarian politics to Amazigh (Berber) politics policy ?
