Mohamed Bodhan[/caption]
Monday, February 16, 2015 – 15:45
Publishing lingual Mr. Abdul Qader Fassi Fihri, the newspaper “Today’s News” in its issue of Saturday and Sunday, 1718 يناير 2015 an analytical article entitled “Arabic Language University and a tool effective in the State Fair”, repeat it more or less what Altribion, one of the elders, that Arabic in Morocco is the common language and the University, any language that they contribute to the building of Moroccan unit as one people belonging to one nation. Analyzes and literature that highlight these monotheistic function and the university, which is attributable to an Arab, and many frequent when Moroccan intellectuals and professionals them in regard lingual, such as Mr. Fihri said, or Mr. Fouad Bu Ali, who wrote, for his part, the newspaper “renewal” of the day February 17, 2010: «The pride different Balomazegeyat and our insistence on Twasalia appreciation and media in the context of the proposed entities should not be on the expense of our deep belief that Arabic is the origin who founded the nation’s fabric »,« however, Arabic is the core of the unit, first and always ».
It has become something ordinary and banal, as a prelude to “Tallah”, that is emphasized and reminders, and so whenever the issue of language in Morocco discussed, in the context of the demands raised Amazigh, that Arabic is the language that combines the Moroccans, manufactures and unity.
What matters in this “Confirmation” and “recall” is not what Athbtana Arab Unity language, but what is Anvianh may be, depending on situations and contexts, explicit or implicit, but clear and understandable. What Anvianh is that the Amazigh language is not the language of “unity”, which means they may be the language of division and discrimination threaten national unity, or do not contribute to, at best, in the unification of the Moroccans as do the Arabic language. This position repeats, is implied, “nice” a lie “barbaric back”, and gives legitimacy to the policy of Arabization criminal projecting a policy of national unity, based on that Arabic is the common language and the University. The end of the final virtue of unity, which is attributed to Arabic, is the persuasion that localization is essential for national unity.
Is it true that the Arab factor to unite the Moroccans, and that the Amazigh do not play this unifying role?
If it is proven that the Arab necessary for national unity for the Moroccans, and Amazigh can not be achieved with this unit, I am ready to devote the rest of my life to defend the Arab and the Arabization policy, and work to convince the Amazigh to abandon their language Amazigh Arab and adopt a substitute for it, to ensure the protection of national unity . But if it is proved that the Amazigh can be is also assuming that Arab unity is really the language of national unity, mainly Moroccans, it is my right and the right of every Moroccan to defend Amazigh, and I call upon the Moroccans to the attachment and learning and to ensure the protection of national unity.
To proceed from some examples to illustrate the relationship of the language of national unity in general, before we move on to discuss the Arabic language to do with this unit.
No one argues that France is a unitary state. But language is not Arabic, but French. The thing that allows saying, compared to those who believe that Arabic is the language of unity, that unity is the basis of the French language. The same thing can be said and we observe for each Unified State and nationally, without having the language is Arabic. Turkey, with the Turkish language, a unified state, and Iran with a unified Persian language, and Britain, which have a uniform English language, and Japan with a Japanese uniform, and so on.
Why show confirms these examples? Show and confirm that the Arab, if the unit is in Morocco language, says the owners of this opinion we are discussing, this function unitary, not permission is limited to the Arab own as Arabic language, but is a public function here we agree with all the logic Altribian who say that the Arabic language Unity is found in all languages, as the above examples illustrate. In this case, of course, in which the play is really the language and actually role in the national unity as the owners say, “the language of Arab unity”, who refute logic in this discussion.
The result, therefore, that, as the Arab unity always by logic Altribian factor, so can any other language to play this role, as seen in the above examples. And therefore this is what concerns us, the Amazigh are also available on this unitary function, if there was really a unitary function of language. So, as we have the right to defend Arab because of what is due them from job consolidation, it is our right as well as the defense of the Amazigh ability to unify the Moroccans and ensure national unity of Morocco.
But it can also, in the opposite direction of the unit, assumed in each language as we have seen, not only in the Arabic language, come up with examples of counter, show that the language may be a cause of division and fragmentation.
Prior to his unit in 1990, the German people were divided into two separate and independent from one another (East Germany and West Germany) with that of Gthma one language, the language is German.
Today there are South Korea and North Korea as independent from one another with that Gthma one language, the language is Korean.
Also, we find the so-called Arab world is divided into several independent states and separate from each other, despite the fact that the language of this one Arab countries, which is the Arabic language.
But we find that the separatists “Polisario” claim to political separation from Morocco despite the fact that their language is the same as the official state language of Morocco, which is Arabic.
On another level, contrary, we may find a united states in multiple languages, as in Spain, Belgium, Switzerland and Iraq …
What do we conclude from these examples and models? We conclude that a single language can be a unifying factor, or split factor, as that multilingualism can be as well as national unity factor.
Why this inconsistency and contradiction in political functions and roles (The national unity and retail) to the language?
In fact, these manifestations, associated with language does not appear, conflicting and contradictory, but when the attribute of the language function national reunification, such as those who do not see the unity in Morocco, but in light of the Arabic language guarantors in the opinion of this unit, the opposite of what other languages and mean Amazigh specifically which may be the source of The band split. The language in itself, as the language, it is no direct causal relationship of unity and division, as the examples mentioned above showed. It is to be the Arabic language does not necessarily mean that they are united or divided, but there may be a unit or there may be a separation and segmentation, despite everyone language is Arabic. The first basis for national unity is a common home makes it imperative for the population living within the joint, which in turn produce the political will to establish a joint one political entity to organize the co-existence in the home of the joint. Those who share this common domicile common political entity, may be the language is Arabic or Berber, French or any other language or dialect. Also behind the division and separation of political will as well as to establish a separate political entities separate areas, despite the fact that the language of the separatist entities may be a single, unified, such as the one that the Arabic language is the language of the separate Arab states independent political entities from each other.
We know that many countries have adopted, historical and political reasons, a foreign official languages, Calcenegal, Brazil, India and South Africa …, without compromising on national unity. As we find Arab states did not prevent it, “Unity language” of division and civil wars, as in Palestine divided between Fatah’s rule and the rule of Hamas, or, as in Yemen, which is known as a conflict between the Houthis and the central government, or, as in Syria, which is known as a civil war between the organization “Daash “The organization of Bashar al-Assad. If we believe in the logic of the owners, “the language of Arab unity,” the sooner we respond to them, based on the examples of Palestine, Yemen, Syria, and split the Arab states, that Arabic is the language of division and retail excellence, and therefore should be left and stay away from them in order to preserve national unity.
Such situations that jeopardize the national unity of Morocco in the Arabic language, and warns implicitly or explicitly Amazigh language as a “division” and “separation”, offend a lot to the Arabic language when she says that she Unity language, and at the same time there are Arab countries live separation and retail and civil wars. Which highlights the Arab, not as a unit and the unification, but as a separation and segregation and civil wars, especially the Arab people is the only people in the world is divided into many small states, although the language is Arabic. How to be the language of Arab unity and are unable to unify the original owners? In this link, between Arab unity, to avoid this language and abuse it, and so in two ways:
Highlighted as a practice associated with division and differentiation, and not lost unity, as in the case of the Arab countries.
Arab ethnic liaison Arabism, which is the tendency of ethnic ignorance, promotes division associated with this element of Arabism, ethnic and tribal substance.
All of these conclusions are not, of course, are real and logical, but when we go to deduce who warn of the Amazigh, and claim to adhere to in Arabic in Morocco because it is “the language of unity.”
As to these, the owners of “Arab unity language of” reverse Amazigh their opinion Alomazagovoba, jumping as well as linguistic unity of the Arab (unit grammatical and lexical) in return for what they call a multiplicity of “Amazigh dialects”, as if the “unity” of Arabic Language something closely by grew up with it was gradually built as a result of the circumstances of help, educational and political factors. Unity lexical and grammatical language imposed by the school, which taught the same language for all. If available such circumstances and factors Amazigh language, to become the common language is as well.
To say that Arab unity language they originally common language, unlike the Amazigh which is still a “accents” difficult communication between users, in which case it will be the unifying role of the language is limited to communication and written use, and beyond that to the political and national reunification, a subject we are discussing , something that is not restricted to the Arab, as Moroccans also communicate, and uniformly, in French, writing and Tkhataba reverse Arabic that do not communicate only by writing.
On the other hand, how do we talk about the relationship of the Arab national unity in Morocco, at a time when we do not find it a Moroccan one used this language in its continuance and making the voice daily? How can her permission to unite Moroccans or even dispersed?
Now, make it clear that when we say that the language has not had a direct causal relationship of unity and division, it is only in order to refute the opinion Altribian who associate unit Morocco and Moroccans in the Arabic language, which is useful, the concept of the offense, that no waiver of Arab Berber favor is a waiver of unit Morocco , which ultimately means that any prejudice is prejudice Arabization foundations of national unity, and thus, and that is the end of the myth of the unifying role of the Arab, any advancement of the Amazigh language is negligence in the national unity.
The truth is that the relationship is always the language unit people who speak that language when its own language, belongs Hoiatia, historically and geographically and human. This is because the common element and the whole of a people, as noted above, is native to the geographical scope, which shares all the sons of this people in possession and belonging to him. Then comes the national language of the people, which is not only the face Alseny to his home and his land, because that language is the language of the home and the land. For this, we find that the theorists of European nationalities in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and especially the Germans were thinkers such as “Fakhteh”, consider the common national language prerequisite for the establishment of a unified national state. He has built a philosopher of Arab nationalism, incandescent exclusive, conceived of the latter on the Arabic as a common language and a common element of the Arab nation, because it is a private Arabs as a national language.
But what are the common national language? It is common ground that give all the people of his identity distinct language. Valmutn, as a source of collective identity of the people, his earthy side is a common ground, and by the Sunni is the language that the common ground. In Morocco, the language that represents the common ground is the language of the Amazigh, then rolling stock that has gained status of the land is also a language for it, such as the Amazigh, grew up in this land of African Amazigh, it did not come from the outside, such as Latin, Arabic or French. They made themselves Amazigh, they created when they spoke Omazegethm using the Arabic lexicon. They are, from this point of view, a copy of the Amazigh other formula to it.
If there is a language and a unified University of Moroccans, they are Amazigh permission and rolling stock for Gthma, because they are the working languages of the Amazigh land which is the primary source of unity. An understanding of the two languages Qomettan two private Moroccan people, which is part of the Amazigh people of North Africa, Tattiyana, next to the geographical homeland, his own identity that distinguishes it from all other peoples. Which makes it one people, and united.
As an example of the unifying role of the rolling and Amazigh, unlike Arabic, we note that Moroccan immigrants, for example, in Europe or America or Australia …, when they meet people, talk, for one reason or another, Arabic, they see, even if it was originally a Moroccan, a foreigner them not brought them together by any Association or emotion, because it may be Syria or Kuwaiti or Saudi or Yemeni or Lebanese … but if you spoke Amazigh or rolling felt, and even if it was of Algerian nationality or Libyan example, that one of them, collected their native language, which is a privately held their people the language and Bmutnhm. Valomazegeh and rolling stock, unlike Arabic, are creating, and automatically, unity and common feelings of belonging to the private and public Maghreb Moroccan, because they are bilingual Qomettan, constitute the face Alseny for the same land that belongs to the north of Africa’s population, as previously stated.
The Arab and French, may be everything a language, any language of science, religion and culture and economy and culture … but it will not be a unity language, because it is not a national language for the Moroccan people, that is, such as French as well, is not the language of the land. As written by communication after he learned in school, it will not change anything from the set as a school and not a nationalist, just like the French Moroccan communicate without having to be the national language.]]>
In refuting the myth of Arab Position monotheistic
