How was the use of the word “compass”, contained in an article by Professor Bensalem Himmich address, collectors of philosophy and former minister of culture, the electronic publication “Hespress” Professor Gazette (see link: http://www.hespress.com/orbites/261294.html) Day April 19, 2015 entitled ” Himmich address Ohrid: while losing intellectual compass , “(how much was) correct and successful and appropriate. The “Compass” is the most suitable for the separation and discrimination floor between the positions of each of the two professors Hassan Ohrid and Bensalem Himmich of language and identity issues in Morocco.
Known as “Compass” It is equipped with a scorpion on the hour magnetized tool, which makes it always moves in the direction of the Earth’s poles ° are shown. As well as the “compass” Alhoiatih professor Himmich, but they are magnetic, and abnormally, textured ethnic Arabism origin Levantine, they are always moving, not in the direction of Morocco Amazigh Africa, but in the direction of the Arab East Asian, pole magnetic attracts him Mr. Himmich and his ilk of Moroccan intellectuals transgender, and Hoiatia any nationally, according to the original meaning of the word “sex” in Arabic. When using a Moroccan intellectuals misfits (Hoiatia) compass natural Alhoiatih, any that are not overlooking textured external and foreign internal Magnatisha natural magnetism, as when Mr. Ohrid, and refuses to falsify this compass adding magnet ethnic Arabism to it as does Professor Himmich, not even moving hands move in the direction of Morocco Amazigh African, Mr. Himmich address him and accuse him of Balglu, and Bmwalah Israel, and the application of the journal “to Aouti” for the year 1921, and the denial of the fact that “fusion” between Arabs and Berbers … This is what came in response Mr. Himmich to Professor Ohrid. It is the response that we will discuss in this article some detail.
It should be noted that this discussion of an article Professor Hamees not in defense of Professor Ohrid, which does not require those who defended him because of his ideas do the job more than enough, but I found the answer Professor Himmich an occasion to dismantle the discourse Altribi Alomazagovoba a group of Moroccan intellectuals.
Professor Himmich says he was waiting Professor of Ohrid to be «qualification with a few to rethink the Amazigh issue with the necessary wisdom and moderation and the ability to save them from extremists abusive to them».
What is meant by “moderation” and “extremists”?
Amazigh has been excluded, full and absolute exclusion, for more than half a century, until they almost die as a bet on the state of Independence little by little, and as a culture and identity, and the owners of Moroccans watched it nor stirred. This is what he meant Mr. Himmich to “moderation”, ie to accept the exclusion of the Amazigh and killing gradual, not demanding the lifting of this exclusion and stop this killing.
But what began demanding group of Moroccan Amazigh rights, and are struggling to answer Alaabar Amazigh, the language, culture and identity and history, these are the “extremists” by Professor Himmich. This provision may seem natural after half a century of exclusion of the Amazigh, which has become, because of the long duration, something normal and natural. And therefore it is natural, but it is obvious, that is seen to demand the lifting of this exclusion, having lasted more than half a century, as “hyperbole” and “extremism”, if the exclusion acquired right fixed, not obligatory review and reconsider it. This reminds us of the position of the Israelis officials of the Palestinian demands since the establishment of the Jewish state in 1948 when there was the absence of a Palestinian movements Organization for the Defense of Palestinian rights, Israel was considered the absence of “moderate.” As to the Fatah movement was founded in 1967 to defend the right of the Palestinian, Israeli activists considered this movement “terrorists” and “ultra” extremists.
Logical and realistic, those who are “extremists” are like: Are they who are demanding Bomazegethm (language, culture, identity and history) excluded, which they were deprived, or who kept away this Amazigh and deprived them of their owners? In fact, a Tamazight errors is that it had never, throughout their history, that they were “ultra” to counter the hyperbole of others. This explains why they were always the victim of extremism practiced by them and other tribes. However, the most “extremists” anti-Berber Amazigh and they Altribion contemporaries, transgender (nationally and Hoiatia), who is a professor Himmich elders and Oqtabhm.
Even Ichetun demands Alomazagbh, do not hesitate to accuse Mr. Himmich of defenders of these demands for «Israel they make a pilgrimage site and a kiss». Do not be surprised why do not you say about the Moroccans residing formal commercial exchangers (I say official because of Israeli goods entering through the Moroccan border does not descend from heaven stealthily in the darkness) with Israel, nor the Moroccan officials who are called Alasraúalann officials in an official capacity to Morocco, and thousands of Moroccans who are visiting Asraúiel, nor Moroccan parliamentarians who refused to project the criminalization of normalization with Israel Law, (do not be surprised why does not say) that they are all «took Israel pilgrimage site and kiss», says that for a few Omazageyen activists visited Israel in the framework of a private associative relationships are no official regulated by State … do not be surprised that, but I am surprised at how “philosopher” waving Pfazzah Israel to incite Amazigh and terrorism Amazigh, note that the Amazigh linking Israel is the new version of the lie of “barbaric back”, which exposed his command after that everyone is aware that this “Berber Dahir “does not exist in history, so much so that the users of this myth to create alternative legend, a relationship Amazigh activists in Israel, any relationship to Zionism. The goal is the same goal, which was designed by the legendary “Berber Dahir”, namely Hith Amazigh and lobbying them and denigrate them. So how’s “philosopher,” that depends on Moslem pilgrims on rumors and falsely and falsehoods, and he knows that philosophy did not appear only to rid the intellect and the mind of these phenomena?
And blaming Mr. Himmich to Professor Ohrid saying (and the source is Professor Himmich that transports us to the words of Professor Ohrid) that Amazigh «grabbed them all, their language, their culture, their spirit, their land, their water, their history, and even their dreams.» Vered that «the truth is that since they are in the past that date were the name of Islam builders of nations and empires and Meshmin a significant contribution in Morocco and Sciences culture […], as they are in our time are among the front-presence and favored in all politics, economy and centers of influence and decision-circles ». Yes they were «Builders states and empires» «the name of Islam», she says, and not in the name of Arabism ethnic Arab and ethnicity, which was imposed on the Moroccan criminal Arabization policy, racism and ignorance, which aims to transform the sex Amazigh to Arabic sex.
This sexual conversion (National Alhoiati) for Moroccans, who practiced them Arabization policy abhorrent, has already led to grab their spirit Amazigh, represented by the North African identity, and grab what accompanies this identity of the language and culture. The land has already been extracted them when it became known as an “Arab Maghreb”, which became an Arab land, a land of the Arabs, not the land of Amazigh. This is not to talk about the back April 27, 1919, which prevent the Berber tribes of the disposition of millions of hectares of land, which is still valid after independence, as long as those that did not land due to the real indigenous owners. The history is the first thing that was taken away sexual conversion policy, which they call localization, when his craft and Zorth and imposed his place history fake and a liar, serving ethnic Arabism, and detract from the Amazigh and offend them, as evidenced by the myth of the “barbaric back” that taught in schools a real date.
Today, if the Amazigh «are among the front-presence and favored in all politics, economy and centers of influence and decision circles», even assuming that this is true, there is no change from the fact they Msloban of identity collective Amazigh, as long as they Amazigh, who occupy the centers influence and decision, but rather represent an Arab country, Morocco, and not with a collective identity HCA HCA state, in line with the Earth Berber Morocco by virtue of belonging to al-Turabi North Africa, and not to the Arab race. As long as the State is acting as an Arab state, with Arabic affiliation, ethnic sense, whatever the HH positions occupied by Amazigh within this state, the piece does not increase, but a confirmation of the looting and the exclusion of their identity, and recommend the ethnic Arab identity of this state.
Note that “Valsova” repeats, when the owners of the window inferred Balomazageyen centers, public pilgrims from Alomazegovobien when they say that among the Amazigh ministers and senior staff, and then ask: “Where is the Amazigh exclusion?” With that exclusion is not about deprivation of this post or the other, but the name of any affiliation practiced this state authority and political, is on behalf of the membership of the Amazigh as an HCA, the concept Turabi, any state that belong to the home located in North Africa, or on behalf of belonging to an ethnic Arabism, any as an Arab ethnic sense and not al-Turabi, because no Arab land in Asia and not in North Africa.
The biggest problem they understand very minor, with “Valsova”, the concept of “mother tongue”, which gives him a guaranteed “biology” to be linked exclusively to the mother Almnjbh. That’s an argument that says “mother tongue” erase «language and parental single father (monoparentale in the case of the mother’s death or absence), as well as couples of mixed language (foreign parent) and the language of Moroccan mothers who Akelmen their offspring exclusively in French». With the concept of “mother tongue” means the first language acquired by the child, either through the mother or father, or from people who are not bound together by maternity and paternity child relationship, such as births abandoned, or who have adopted them other families may be foreign. P “” Berber mother tongue, then, is that the first language acquired by the child in the Berber language environment, even if this child of French or German or Arab descent. This is called Mr. Abdul Qader Fassi Fihri This is the first language of “innate language”, ie the first language acquired by a person at an early age, and without education, no coercion.
As provided for “mother tongue” wrong, all is the conclusion of Professor Himmich this introduction is necessarily wrong. Thus goes on in the production and errors conclusion when he says that the “mother tongue” «not really prepare the child to talk and conceptual picture, which does not happen only in the acquisition of school age.»
First, all the acquired child through school is to learn, not Akedzaba. The difference large between learning, which is the work of architect and organizer, forced and intentional, defined goals, and the acquisition of which is “learning” self and automatically and naturally there is no compulsion in which no coercion, such as the acquisition of “mother tongue” that “learns” the child without realizing that he “learns “something.
Second, these words do not say, but is not aware of the fact that school learning in general relationship, and a “mother tongue” in particular. If the latter does not allow the child to the exercise of language and conceptual picture, it is a very natural thing, because the child does not yet have the ability to abstraction, which requires the use of conceptual language. But as far as learn new ideas in school, the more they learn, parallel, new words to express those ideas. The result is that with the expansion of the use of knowledge to learn new concepts, and at the same time expand the lexicon of language. More importantly, in this learning process, in which the child learns at the same time, ideas, concepts and language, is that it does not feel that he learns a new language different from the language innate, because all learn from new concepts expressed in new words, being within the same linguistic pattern that has already been acquired, a “mother tongue”. Thing that facilitates the educational process and contributes greatly to the success of the student in his study. This explains that one of the main reasons, if not the sole reason for the failure of the educational system in Morocco, is a complete separation between the school and the language and the language of the home, the “mother tongue.” Which results in the Moroccan student, rather than to learn knowledge and science skills, spends his whole life in school to learn Arabic first, so learn the science knowledge and skills. Hence the importance of teaching the “mother tongue”, such as the Amazigh, provided suitable configured to create a functional language school.
Reiterates Professor Himmich colloquial idea that explain the Moroccan identity of the phenomenon of “mating” and “fusion” between Amazigh and Arabs presumed, saying: «How can we jump on the phenomenon of college is in the history of migrations and Almassahrat and Ansharrat heavy prolonged, and resulted in the volatility Genialogih and lingual touched the world areas of human and complete sets? ». Jumping off them are, first, who call our home the “Maghreb”, ie Morocco Arabs, considering his identity purely Arab, Naveen any such label “fusion” between different asset population components. And jumping off them, secondly, they Altribion who imposed one language, the language is Arabic, Mgosain what resulted in the “fusion” «fluctuations Genialogih and lingual».
And jumping off them, thirdly, they Menthlo “Sharif descent”, Kantme ethnic racist based on the concept of ethnic serenity, which does not recognize any melting and mixing of the races and the blood.
On the other hand, call the concept of “fusion” is the perception of the years, as I said, and ethnic identity because it is linked to race, in a time when people are derived from the geographical habitat collective identity, and not from the different ethnic population. Here ask the professor Himmich following question: Why did not “fusion” when other peoples to the multiplicity and “fusion” in identity depending on the multiplicity and “fusion” races and lineages population? Why only Morocco is the one who should not be depending on the native Amazigh Berber, because there is a “fusion” between Amazigh and some Arabs? Why “fusion” did not change the identity of the peoples of the earth and change it only in North Africa? With that the rule governing “fusion” so that the use of this term is that the item is a newcomer that “melts” in the original item, without changing anything about the identity of the indigenous population, except in the case of the final and not the temporary seizure on land These indigenous (see details subject of «in refuting the myth of” fusion “between Arabs and Berbers» on “Hsebres” link: http://www.hespress.com/writers/252305.html).
Professor Himmich says Professor Ohrid did not hesitate, about the invasion of Morocco, in preference “to Aouti” Musa bin Nasir. And who would hesitate in that? Musa Bin Naseer March looting and captivity and Alastghulam (converting children to the young men and pro), and the ruins was built and destroyed and did not make, and uprooted did not sow, and spoiled and did not fit … As “to Aouti”, although he was an invader, such as Musa Bin Naseer, he is at least structures and making the fittest and planting …, but to create a new state in Morocco, what holds the whole concept of the meaning. And do not forget that the other difference between the two, is that “the Aouti” came to Morocco to build a signed between him and the elite officinalis Arab Treaty, which asked him to protect them (hence the concept of protection). The Musa Bin Naseer came to Morocco without being asked that one.
And linked to “the Aouti,” Professor Himmich reminds us that the latter policy is given at the end «” Berber Dahir “famous, which prohibits the Berbers learn Arabic». Here I am confident that Mr. Himmich did not read the text at all what he calls the “Berber Dahir”, because the latter does not include any separate item or for teaching or not teaching any language, because the theme is to regulate customary courts, not Ifta in languages and taught. How about talking Professor Himmich back does not know or does not address the real substance? And Ahalh on the book “Berber Dahir: fact or myth?”, Which is available on the link (http://tawiza.x10.mx/dahir.pdf), even discover the truth of what he calls the “Berber Dahir.”
And sarcastic tone, and inappropriate replaced, says that Mr. Ohrid do not write only in English, and this contrasts with the defense of the Amazigh. To overcome this contradiction there advise him of «trying to put the hand in the dough Tevenag to edit, as a leader, studies, novels and perhaps creates followers and appellants». It’s always the same inadequate and colloquial language to view, as seen in the issue of “mother tongue”. What Ohrid writes Professor and Professor Himmich? They write in English and French. Why do they write in both languages? Because they are in school when Althaka impose upon them to learn Arabic and French, Vosubha Egidanama and will write them. Had studied Amazigh for them, such as Arabic and French, to become Egidanha and will write them are as well. If any living language, such as English, French and Berber and rolling …, can acquire oral use at home or the street or the lab, the knowledge of writing the required learned in school or its substitute. Professor Himmich using the same logic colloquial common Alomazegovobien when some ignorant people, who respond to Arab users to defend Amazigh as follows: “If the real Amazigh language you wrote your articles out and Astammeltmoha instead of your use of Arabic.”
This trend is evident when Alomazagovoba Professor Himmich, Ntejah is logical to delinquency “compass” in the direction of ethnic Arabism, because they contain a magnet these ethnic Arabism, as I have already explained. Because of this it has become “compass” wreaks on attractive and attracted towards these ethnic Arabism, which is what made him make a huge effort, through flimsy and false introductions and false inferences, to convince us that Morocco is not Amazigh countries in the collective identity. It must then be cut with Alhoiati false consciousness, and recovers consciousness Alhoiati proper, and fixes glitches “compass” even guide it to the identity of the Amazigh real African, and not even Tdillh sail by some Asian Arab identity, the same does not recognize him as an Arab identity and belonging.]]>
Himmich compass that not only move in the direction of the Orient
